Global warming research has become big business worldwide. Each year billions of dollars are spent studying climate change. The United Nations Program for Environment (UNEP), now has an annual budget that has reached more than $ 136 million. The Bush Administration has spent more than thirty billion dollars in federal programs involved in global warming over the past six years. In total, global warming proponents are estimated to have been financed by more than fifty billion dollars over the last decade.

This huge influx of money flowing directly into the pockets of the proponents of man-global warming. It is a river of money that can be turned off only if it is discovered that the man does not cause global warming and climate change is really beyond our control. Indeed, the very people who benefit from the enormous pool of research funding would have to be motivated to turn it off.

The truth is that the target company of the man global warming is increasingly flow of scientific research grants and bureaucratic jobs. The worst man-made global crisis, the better for global warming business. In addition, the media loves stories of fear. This makes the man global warming a big business for television, magazines and books.

Various “experts” in the man-global warming appear regularly on television to remind everyone of the next global climate catastrophe in the next century. Unfortunately, not in the interest of the media to question the man global warming. It is a very good business for them. The fact is that very little coverage in the media is given to research that questions the so-called scientific man-made global warming consensus.

Therefore, it is not surprising that we have not heard much of the media on the recent blockbuster report (December 2007) at the prestigious International Journal of Climatology (Royal Society weather), teachers: David H. Douglass (University of Rochester), Prof. John R. Christy (University of Alabama), Benjamin D. Pearson and S. Fred Singer, professor (University of Virginia). In this report, scientists found that “patterns of temperature changes in the last 30 years in accordance with what greenhouse models predict and can better be explained by natural factors such as solar variability.” They concluded that climate change is “unstoppable” and can not be affected or modified by controlling the emission of greenhouse gases such as CO2, as proposed in current legislation.

Dr. S. Fred Singer, said: “The current warming trend is simply part of a natural cycle of climate warming and cooling that has been seen in ice cores, deep-sea sediments, stalagmites, etc., and published in hundreds of documents peer reviewed journals. “Our research shows that the current increase in atmospheric CO2 has only a small impact on climate change. We must conclude, therefore, that attempts to control CO2 emissions are ineffective and pointless - but very expensive. ”

media has not made us aware that data (2005) NASA’s Mars Global Surveyor and Odyssey missions revealed that the carbon dioxide “ice caps” near Mars’ south pole had been diminishing for three summers in a row. This means that both Earth and Mars have similar degrees of global warming. Of course, the problem for man-global warming crowd is that there are no humans on Mars for them to blame for global warming.

In a story in National Geographic February 2007 Habibullo Abdussamatov, head of space research at St. Petersburg’s Pulkovo Astronomical Observatory in Russia, according to data from the Mars test is that the current warming of the Earth is being caused by changes in the sun. That reason that “The long-term increase in solar irradiance is heating both Earth and Mars.”

man-made global warming, we must remind the industry of the tulip bulb mania in Holland in 1636. The history books tell us that in 1593 tulips were brought from Turkey and introduced to the Dutch. The novelty of the new flower was widely sought. After a while, not tulips contracted a deadly virus known as mosaic, which altered because of different colors to appear on the petals. The color patterns came in a wide variety and the increasing popularity of the flower.

The rise in popularity of tulips led to an increase in the price. Soon everyone began to treat tulip bulbs. It became a big business. Finally, things became so crazy that people sell all their property, including their homes and livestock, to buy tulip bulbs. At the time, the consensus expectation was that the tulip bulbs will grow in value forever.

In 1636, tulips were traded on the Amsterdam Stock Exchange, which also houses the tulip speculators who had become the principal market for tulip bulbs. The price of a tulip bulb at the height of this mania was $ 76,000. In the next six weeks of tulip bulbs in the value would be reduced to less than a dollar.

Today, the man, global warming is similar to the tulip bulb mania in Holland in 1636. It is an issue that has been hyped into a big business. The absurdity of consensus in the Netherlands in 1636 was that the tulips are so unique that continue to increase in value forever. The current global warming people want us to believe that global warming is controllable and men. There is no conclusive evidence that global warming is man-made and all evidence to the contrary are dismissed and ridiculed. We are told we must act now to save the planet or our world will be lost to a multitude of catastrophic events in the future.

The inconvenient truth of all this is that, like the Holland tulip bulb in 1636, man-made global warming hype has entered the world of the absurd. We think the price of $ 76,000 for a tulip bulb in Holland was silly. But how stupid is when compared with global warming in fashion today? In fact, in the future people look back with humor in a decade when tens of billions of dollars are spent in an attempt to convince society that global warming is man and not a function the sun.